Free service hotline
net04@gtggroup.com
TEL: 0769-85075888-6618
13925591357
Fax: 0769-85075898
Mail: net04@gtggroup.com
ADD: Huacan Industrial Park, No. 2 Keji 8th Road, Songshan Lake Park, Dongguan City, Guangdong Province
The EU Cyber Resilience Act is now law, and the compliance countdown is accelerating. For wireless product exporters, the most pressing question is not "what is the CRA" but "how do I actually get my product certified?" This guide is built around practical execution — from risk assessment to documentation, from testing standards to conformity assessment pathways — walking through the full process of obtaining CRA certification for wireless products.
Before launching CRA compliance work, manufacturers should complete three essential confirmations:
Confirm product scope The test: does the product contain digital elements (firmware/software/app/cloud backend) AND data connectivity (Bluetooth/Wi-Fi/cellular)? If both are true, the product falls within CRA scope. Consider a Wi-Fi smart plug: it has firmware, a companion app, a cloud backend, and Wi-Fi connectivity — a textbook CRA-regulated product.
Identify the conformity assessment pathway The CRA conformity assessment model offers two primary routes: internal production control (Module A) and third-party conformity assessment. For critical and important product categories, Notified Body involvement may be required. The pathway depends on the product's risk classification.
Map overlaps with existing certifications Wireless products typically already require RED, EMC, and LVD compliance. CRA compliance must integrate with existing certification frameworks — not operate in parallel. Audit your current technical documentation to identify what can be reused and what needs to be created from scratch.

The CRA certification process for wireless products can be broken into five practical steps:
Step 1 — Cybersecurity Risk Assessment This is the starting point and core of CRA compliance. Manufacturers should use established methodologies (STRIDE, ISO 27005, NIST SP 800-30) to systematically analyse the product's entire attack surface. The assessment should cover: wireless protocol security (Bluetooth/Wi-Fi encryption and authentication implementations), firmware integrity protection, data storage and transmission security, cloud interface security, and physical interface security (debug ports, USB interfaces).
Step 2 — Security Design Remediation and Verification Based on risk assessment findings, implement necessary security design changes. Typical remediation items include: strengthening default password policies, enabling transport encryption (TLS 1.2+), implementing secure boot chains, disabling unnecessary debug ports, and adding firmware signature verification. After remediation, confirm results through penetration testing or security functional verification.
Step 3 — CRA Technical Documentation The CRA requires comprehensive technical documentation including: risk assessment reports, secure design specifications, vulnerability management policies, security update plans (minimum 5-year support period), third-party component SBOM and due diligence records, and conformity assessment procedure descriptions. Technical documentation must be retained for at least 10 years after the product is placed on the market.
Step 4 — EU Declaration of Conformity The manufacturer signs an EU Declaration of Conformity (EU DoC) confirming the product meets all applicable CRA requirements. The declaration must reference applicable harmonised standards and include manufacturer details, product identification, and a description of the conformity assessment procedure followed.
Step 5 — CE Marking and Market Placement Upon completing the above steps, the product can bear the CE marking and be sold in the EU market. The CE marking must indicate the CRA regulation number. Manufacturers must also ensure the product is accompanied by essential security information, including the security support period and vulnerability reporting channels.
CRA documentation requirements are more stringent than traditional CE certification. Below is the core checklist for wireless products:
Field insight: When assisting multiple wireless device manufacturers with CRA compliance setup, the most commonly overlooked documentation item is the "third-party component SBOM and due diligence records." Many wireless products integrate extensive open-source components and third-party SDKs but lack systematic component inventories and vulnerability tracking records. Establishing an SBOM management process early, using automated tools for continuous component vulnerability monitoring, is strongly recommended.
CRA conformity assessment pathways depend on the product category. Below are the key standards and assessment models wireless product manufacturers should be aware of:
CRA horizontal standards Expected to be finalised by August 2026, these will provide a unified baseline security framework for all applicable digital products. This is the core reference standard for CRA compliance.
CRA vertical standards Sector-specific or product-type-specific standards, with timelines slightly later than horizontal standards. Wireless products may need to meet both horizontal and relevant vertical standards.
EN 18031 series As the cybersecurity standard under the RED, it can partially cover CRA technical requirements. Completing EN 18031 testing provides useful technical evidence for CRA compliance but does not replace CRA's lifecycle risk management requirements.
ETSI EN 303 645 The baseline cybersecurity standard for consumer IoT products, serving as an important reference for CRA compliance. This standard has been designated as the presumption-of-conformity standard under the UK PSTI Act.

With the CRA compliance deadline advancing phase by phase, wireless product manufacturers should adopt a staged approach:
Now through June 2026 Complete cybersecurity risk assessments, establish vulnerability management mechanisms, compile SBOMs, and finish security design remediation and verification.
July – September 2026 Launch vulnerability reporting channels, complete EN 18031 testing (if applicable), finalise CRA technical documentation, and prepare for the September 2026 vulnerability reporting obligation.
October 2026 – June 2027 Conduct compliance gap analysis against CRA horizontal standards (expected August 2026), complete conformity assessment procedures, and sign the EU Declaration of Conformity.
July – November 2027 Complete final compliance validation, ensuring all products are fully compliant before the 11 December 2027 full application date. A 3–4 month buffer is recommended to accommodate regulatory interpretation adjustments or standard updates.
Q1 Does CRA certification require third-party laboratory involvement?
It depends on the product category and conformity assessment pathway. For standard products using internal production control (Module A), manufacturers can self-assess conformity. However, for wireless devices classified as critical or important products, Notified Body involvement for third-party conformity assessment may be required. Confirm your product's risk classification and applicable assessment pathway with a professional body in advance.
Q2 Our wireless product already has CE certification. How much additional work is needed for CRA compliance?
Existing CE certification means the product meets RED, EMC, and LVD requirements, but CRA's cybersecurity risk management requirements are typically entirely new content. From practical experience, building a CRA compliance framework from scratch takes approximately 3–6 months, covering risk assessment, security design remediation, vulnerability management system setup, and technical documentation preparation. If the product has already undergone EN 18031 testing, the technical foundation is stronger and some test data can be reused.
Q3 How much does CRA certification cost?
CRA compliance costs vary significantly based on product complexity, existing security maturity, and chosen assessment pathway. Basic risk assessment and documentation preparation costs are relatively manageable, but if the product requires extensive security design remediation, penetration testing, and third-party assessment, costs will increase accordingly. For a product-specific quotation and compliance roadmap, contact a professional certification body. For more information, visit GTG Certification Services.
This article was generated with AI assistance. Content is for reference only and does not constitute any certification commitment or legal advice. Please refer to the latest official EU regulations.
Contact: net04@gtggroup.com